Dr. MODHWADIA JAYESH D.
Dr. MEHUL SHAH, Dr. SHREYA SHAH, Dr. RUHI GUNAY
Abstract
METHOD: AFTER PROCURING DUE PERMISSION FROM THE ETHICAL COMMITTEE, RETRIVAL OF DATA OF LAST FIVE YEARS IN SPECIFIC FORMAT USING EMR AND ANALYSIS DONE WITH SPSS 22. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSES AND CROSS TABULATION WAS USED TO ANALYSE THE DATA AND P VALUE <0.05 CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT. RESULT: OUR COHORT CONSISTED OF 1006 EYES,OUT OF WHICH 76.6% M ,23.4% F, 51.2% RE, 47. 4% LE AND 1.1% BE. OUT OF THE TOTAL POPULACE, 971 GLOBAL AND 35 ADNEXAL FB WERE FOUND.3.3% IOFB,0.6% ORBITAL,78.7% OSFB,14.5%IMFB. 23.7% WERE FOUND IN CHILDREN , 30% DURING WORK,11.9% DURING TRANSPORT AND 17.9% DURING HOME ACTIVITY. TIMELY TREATMENT LED TO A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN VISUAL ACUITY CONCLUSION: FOREIGN BODY CAN BE OCULAR OR ADNEXAL, REMOVAL AND TREATMENT OF EITHER WILL LEAD TO A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN VISION.[advanced_iframe src="https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/embed.aspx?src=https://aiosproceedings.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/2021/E-Poster/FP326.pptx" width="100%" height="608"]


Leave a Comment